Recent searches

No recent searches

Search options

Only available when logged in.
sigmoid.social is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
A social space for people researching, working with, or just interested in AI!

Administered by:

Server stats:

588
active users

sigmoid.social: AboutProfiles directoryPrivacy policy

Mastodon: AboutGet the appKeyboard shortcutsView source codev4.4.1

Harald Sack

ESWC 2025 has just started with the presentation of the submission numbers to the individual tracks:
research track: 98 papers
resource track: 36 papers
in-use track: 22 papers

Looking forward to great presentations and discussions!

The image shows a presentation slide titled "Research Track in Numbers" displayed on a projector screen. The slide details the statistics of a research track, including the number of abstracts and full paper submissions, the acceptance rate, and the reviewing team's performance. It states that there were 125 abstracts and 98 full paper submissions, with 5 desk rejects and 26 accepted papers, representing a 26.5% acceptance rate. The reviewing team consisted of 23 Senior Program Committee (SPC) members, 156 regular reviewers, 8 emergency reviewers, and 31 subreviewers. The reviewing load was low, with an average of 2.9 papers per PC, 4.0 papers per SPC, and 4.4 reviews per paper. The slide is presented by two individuals standing behind a podium, with one person speaking into a microphone. The background is a plain wall with a green curtain on the left side. Provided by @altbot, generated privately and locally using Ovis2-8B
The image shows a presentation slide titled "In-Use Track in Numbers" displayed on a large screen. The slide contains bullet points with statistical information about the track. The first bullet point states that there were 22 abstracts and 22 full submissions, with 0 desk rejects and 8 accepted papers, which is 36.3% of the submissions, indicating a very competitive track. The second bullet point highlights the "Great reviewing team!" with 25 reviewers, 71 reviews in total, and an average of 3-4 reviews per paper. The third bullet point mentions a "Low review workload" with 2.8 papers per PC (Program Committee member). The presenter is standing at a podium on the left side of the image, with an audience visible in the foreground, facing the screen. The room appears to be a conference or seminar setting, with a simple and professional atmosphere.
The image shows a presentation slide titled "Resource Track in Numbers" displayed on a large screen. The slide contains bullet points with numerical data. The first bullet point states "41 abstracts / 36 full submissions," with sub-points indicating "1 desk reject" and "11 accepted papers (30.6%)." The second bullet point is labeled "Reviewing" and includes "131 reviews," "10 SPC," and "52 reviewers." A person is standing at a podium to the left of the screen, wearing a green shirt and a lanyard, with a microphone in front of them. The audience is partially visible, with the backs of their heads shown. The room appears to be a conference or seminar setting, with a plain background and a projector screen.
#eswc2025#semweb#semanticweb
··Web
0boosts·2favorites
Altbot

@lysander07 The image shows a presentation slide titled "Resource Track in Numbers" displayed on a large screen. The slide contains bullet points with numerical data. The first bullet point states "41 abstracts / 36 full submissions," with sub-points indicating "1 desk reject" and "11 accepted papers (30.6%)." The second bullet point is labeled "Reviewing" and includes "131 reviews," "10 SPC," and "52 reviewers." A person is standing at a podium to the left of the screen, wearing a green shirt and a lanyard, with a microphone in front of them. The audience is partially visible, with the backs of their heads shown. The room appears to be a conference or seminar setting, with a plain background and a projector screen.
―
The image shows a presentation slide titled "In-Use Track in Numbers" displayed on a large screen. The slide contains bullet points with statistical information about the track. The first bullet point states that there were 22 abstracts and 22 full submissions, with 0 desk rejects and 8 accepted papers, which is 36.3% of the submissions, indicating a very competitive track. The second bullet point highlights the "Great reviewing team!" with 25 reviewers, 71 reviews in total, and an average of 3-4 reviews per paper. The third bullet point mentions a "Low review workload" with 2.8 papers per PC (Program Committee member). The presenter is standing at a podium on the left side of the image, with an audience visible in the foreground, facing the screen. The room appears to be a conference or seminar setting, with a simple and professional atmosphere.
―
The image shows a presentation slide titled "Research Track in Numbers" displayed on a projector screen. The slide details the statistics of a research track, including the number of abstracts and full paper submissions, the acceptance rate, and the reviewing team's performance. It states that there were 125 abstracts and 98 full paper submissions, with 5 desk rejects and 26 accepted papers, representing a 26.5% acceptance rate. The reviewing team consisted of 23 Senior Program Committee (SPC) members, 156 regular reviewers, 8 emergency reviewers, and 31 subreviewers. The reviewing load was low, with an average of 2.9 papers per PC, 4.0 papers per SPC, and 4.4 reviews per paper. The slide is presented by two individuals standing behind a podium, with one person speaking into a microphone. The background is a plain wall with a green curtain on the left side.

Provided by @altbot, generated privately and locally using Ovis2-8B

🌱 Energy used: 1.627 Wh

TrendingLive feeds
About