Darnell Clayton :verified:<p>I am surprised <a href="https://one.darnell.one/tags/Japan" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Japan</span></a> 🇯🇵 is forcing <a href="https://one.darnell.one/tags/Apple" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Apple</span></a> to allow alternative browser engines on <a href="https://one.darnell.one/tags/iPhone" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>iPhone</span></a>, <a href="https://one.darnell.one/tags/iPad" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>iPad</span></a> & (maybe‽) <a href="https://one.darnell.one/tags/AppleWatch" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>AppleWatch</span></a> too.</p><p>However, I do not see much competition in the browser market nowadays. It is either WebKit (Safari), Blink (a fork of WebKit that Chromium is based on) or Gecko (for <a href="https://one.darnell.one/tags/FireFox" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>FireFox</span></a>).</p><p>👉🏾 Apple’s lock on iPhone browser engines gets a December deadline 📰 <a href="https://www.theverge.com/news/756580/apple-japan-alternative-ios-browsers" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">theverge.com/news/756580/apple</span><span class="invisible">-japan-alternative-ios-browsers</span></a></p>