ApproveJ v0.9.5 is out
New Replacement interface can be implemented and used with any RegexScrubber.
Deprecates relativeDates() Scrubber
Use DateTimeScrubber.replaceWithRelativeDate() instead.
ApproveJ v0.9.5 is out
New Replacement interface can be implemented and used with any RegexScrubber.
Deprecates relativeDates() Scrubber
Use DateTimeScrubber.replaceWithRelativeDate() instead.
ApproveJ 0.9.4 is out
The new named method of the ApprovalBuilder now allows to approve multiple values in one test case. Previously the first approved file would have been overwritten by the second.
ApproveJ v0.9.3 is out!
/
introduces 16 new pre-defined Scrubbers for date/time strings
fixes broken parsing if a date/time pattern contained a square bracket within an optional part
ApproveJ 0.8.6 was just published
adds new review mechanism to automatically open a diff/merge tool if needed
thanks to all attendees of my session on #ApprovalTesting #verifyTesting #legacyTesting at #socrates Nürnberg last week!
I really enjoyed the discussions during & after the talk!
The slides are here:
https://draptik.github.io/2024-09-swk-nbg-approval-testing/1
Thx #codecentric for sponsoring location & food & drinks
join me on a journey how testing helped our team port a #legacy app
https://www.meetup.com/de-DE/softwerkskammer-nuernberg/events/302057824/
#ApprovalTesting #dotnet
@emilybache 's newest video on dealing with #legacycode is really deep & high-end #tdd #ApprovalTesting !
I learned a lot, thanks Emily!
watch her video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cKj5cz8uAOM
I am playing with a git implementation in #rust. I currently have some tests using the Command API and assert. Since the test output gets large, I wonder whether I should use an `insta` or `lit` crate to test it.
Insta: I am already familiar with it, and it is just plain Rust code. The downside is that I find writing cli command in Rust pretty verbose.
Lit: I like the idea more but it seems unmaintained
Any thoughts?