sigmoid.social is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
A social space for people researching, working with, or just interested in AI!

Server stats:

612
active users

#defendresearch

10 posts6 participants0 posts today
Continued thread

Update. Here are two new bits on this story:
medpagetoday.com/washington-wa

* #NIH director Jay Bhattacharya has been railing against #APCs in conservative news outlets like Charlie Kirk and the Disinformation Chronicle. It looks like opposition to APCs is a warmly received #MAGA talking point. It's almost as if #Republicans supported equity and equitable access but didn't want to use those words.

* The NIH plans to set the APC cap by this by October, at the start of its 2026 fiscal year.

www.medpagetoday.comNIH to Cap How Much Journals Can Charge Authors for Open AccessExact amount still to be determined, agency says

As Commerce Secretary, #HowardLutnick controls the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (#NOAA) and the National Weather Service (#NWS). As he dismantles them, note that he and his sons run a firm that invests in for-profit, private-sector firms that hope to replace NOAA and NWS.
newrepublic.com/post/197750/do

The New Republic · Trump’s Commerce Secretary Will Get Rich Off These Budget CutsHoward Lutnick has ties to companies that gather weather data.

New horrors. The Biodiversity Heritage Library needs help. The Smithsonian Institution will end its support as of 1 Jan 2026.

This is the world's largest open-source archive for biodiversity literature and archives -- the place where you can find all the old, but still very useful, botanical literature, among other things.

Please share widely with your networks. #biodiversity #Archives #defendresearch #botany

about.biodiversitylibrary.org/

about.biodiversitylibrary.orgCall for Support: – About BHL

"Trust and Integrity: A Research Imperative." A joint statement from the Association of Research Libraries (#ARL), International Association of Scientific, Technical & Medical Publishers (#STM), Association of College and Research Libraries (#ACRL), Society for Scholarly Publishing (#SSP), and Association of University Presses (#AUPresses).
scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/20

(Yes, it's rare to see #libraries and #publishers issue joint statements.)

"This year has brought unprecedented challenges to the U.S. research enterprise – sweeping federal funding cuts, capricious reductions in the federal workforce, and destabilizing attacks on universities, laboratories, and federal research agencies…In response to these challenges, we believe in and support: Public investment in basic science and the humanities…The need for broad access to validated, trusted information…Protecting and advancing freedom of speech…and ensuring research and scholarship remain free from political interference."

The Scholarly Kitchen · Trust and Integrity: A Research Imperative - The Scholarly KitchenLibraries and publishers represent the interests of thousands of authors, readers, scientists, researchers, students, and lifelong learners. Today, we stand united to face the mounting risks to public trust and the social benefit that research delivers. 

Not all paused research grants are paused on the govt side. Williams College (@williamscollege) just paused its own acceptance of federal research grants.
berkshireeagle.com/news/northe

The reason is that #Trump science agencies are putting vague and ominous conditions on institutions that accept grants. One faculty member called them "booby traps". The college explained that it needs time to understand and navigate these conditions. Even affected faculty, initially alarmed, seemed to accept the need to do this.

The Berkshire EagleFederal grant pause raises 'deep concern,' confusion among Williams facultyWilliams College paused new NSF and NIH grant funding in response to vague federal restrictions on DEI initiatives under the Trump administration. The move sparked confusion and concern among faculty,

"Mauna Loa Observatory captured the reality of climate change. The US plans to shut it down."
theconversation.com/mauna-loa-

"Data collected by Mauna Loa from 1958 onward let us clearly see the evidence of climate change for the first time. The station samples the air and measures global CO₂ levels. Charles Keeling and his successors used this data to produce the famous Keeling curve – a graph showing carbon dioxide levels increasing year after year…President Donald Trump has decided to defund the observatory."

The ConversationMauna Loa Observatory captured the reality of climate change. The US plans to shut it downCutting data climate collection – as the Trump administration is now trying to do – is like breaking a thermometer to avoid knowing you’ve got a fever.
Continued thread

Update. Three past editors of the New England Journal of Medicine (#NEJM) answer the attack on their journal from #RFKJr.
statnews.com/2025/06/30/rfk-jr
(#paywalled)

"Kennedy claimed that one of us (Angell) said, 'We are no longer a science journal, we are a vessel for pharmaceutical propaganda.' In fact, what Angell said in a 2009 article was that 'it is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published,' due to researchers’ financial ties with pharmaceutical companies."

The editors also point out that the three journals named by Kennedy happen to have published editorials criticizing the #Trump admin assault of science.

STAT · RFK Jr. says medical journals are ‘corrupt.’ As former NEJM editors, we know he’s wrongRFK Jr.’s plan to circumvent established medical journals smacks more of retaliation than reform, write three former NEJM editors.

"The White House took down the nation's top #climate report. You can still find it here."
npr.org/2025/07/01/nx-s1-54535

"The website that hosts the most recent edition of the National Climate Assessment has gone dark. The sprawling report is the most influential source of information about how climate change affects the United States....On Monday (June 30), the government website that hosts all of that information stopped working. The Trump administration had already halted work on the next edition of the report, and fired all the staff who worked on it…An archived version of the most recent edition is available through the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration [#NOAA]. All five editions of the National Climate Assessment that have been published over the years will also be available on #NASA's website."

(Click through to the article for working links.)

"Scientists warn US will lose a generation of talent because of Trump cuts."
theguardian.com/us-news/2025/j

"A generation of scientific talent is at the brink of being lost to overseas competitors by the Trump administration’s dismantling of the National Science Foundation (#NSF), with unprecedented political interference at the agency…The gold standard peer-reviewed process used by the NSF to support cutting-edge, high-impact science is being undermined by the chaotic cuts to staff, programs and grants, and by meddling by the so-called department of government efficiency (#Doge)."

The Guardian · Scientists warn US will lose a generation of talent because of Trump cutsBy Nina Lakhani

"Frances Arnold, who won the 2018 Nobel Prize in chemistry, says U.S. science is 'paying the price' for not explaining the benefits of research funding for 'far too long.' "
insidehighered.com/news/facult

PS: The headline summary is a bit misleading and suggests that Arnold blames scientists for the Trump defunding spree. This passage from the body of her talk shows that her larger position is more balanced:

“Instead of viewing science as the foundation of prosperity, as an investment in the future, it is being portrayed as a burden on taxpayers.”

Scientists don't portray science that way. Anti-scientists do.

Inside Higher Ed | Higher Education News, Events and JobsNobelist: Scientists Took Support “For Granted” Before TrumpFrances Arnold, who won the 2018 Nobel Prize in chemistry, says U.S. science is “paying the price” for not explaining the benefits of research funding for “far too long.”

"Hurricane Science Was Great While It Lasted."
theatlantic.com/science/archiv
(#paywalled)

"For years, the National Hurricane Center has been improving the accuracy of its forecasts, and one short year ago, the United States was better at predicting storms’ tracks than it had ever been. But the Trump administration has been cutting the forecasting staff and budgets. And now these satellite data will be missing too. The U.S. is rapidly losing state-of-the-art hurricane forecasting, just in time for hurricane season’s busiest months…What’s easy to see coming now are the possible consequences: at best, a needless evacuation. But just as easily: a rushed evacuation, a surprise landfall, a flattened house."

The Atlantic · Hurricane Science Was Great While It LastedBy Zoë Schlanger

From William Haseltine (@wmhaseltine): "There is no way that you can substitute for the $50 billion a year that the government puts into the National Institutes of Health [#NIH]…I'm a grandchild of the famous scientists that were forced to leave Europe by Hitler and by the disruptions of World War II. Whether they were Italian or German or English, they formed the nucleus of our academic excellence, and they attracted students. And their students trained me and my generation, and we have trained many others. Once you cut off that flow, which seems to be happening right now, you are impairing the future not for one generation, but for many generations."
npr.org/2025/07/01/nx-s1-54207

More on Haseltine.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_

"Proposed cuts could have ‘catastrophic effect,’ 110 biomedical, health sciences industry leaders tell Congress."
statnews.com/2025/06/27/biotec

A letter to Congress from 110 biopharmacy company leaders, speaking as individualsto. The original is paywalled. (Why?) Here's a free copy from archive.today.
archive.is/lR49q

"Given the currently proposed cuts to federal funding for scientific research, including extensive cuts to the National Institutes of Health [#NIH] and National Science Foundation [#NSF] in the fiscal year 2026 budget, we believe it is imperative — and urgent — to articulate that federal funding for scientific research is essential to the sustainability of the biomedical industry, maintaining the United States’ technological edge, and crucial for this country’s ability to protect and strengthen our economic and national security."

STAT · Proposed cuts could have ‘catastrophic effect,’ 110 biomedical, health sciences industry leaders tell CongressProposed cuts will have “a catastrophic effect on the advancement of biomedical and biotechnology capabilities in the United States,” more than 100 leaders of biomedical/health sciences companies tell Congress.