In part, the current challenges faced by the #openweb and grassroots reboot movements can be traced back to two cultural and structural problems: the influence of #fashernistas and the deeply ingrained #geekproblem. Both of these issues contribute to active blocking of meaningful change, hindering the progress needed for an openweb reboot. To walk this “native” landscape effectively, it’s needed to understand these barriers and how they work to block change and challenge.
The fashernistas and their echo chambers. The term refers to a subset of people who are highly engaged in performative discussions, centred on trending topics and social posturing without substantive engagement in grassroots real world problem-solving. While they are adept at identifying and amplifying transient issues, their conversations stay within insular bubbles. This creates a cycle where attention and focus are pulled toward repetitive discourse that never leads to concrete outcomes.
This taking up space with little and most often no follow-through is detrimental. Fashernistas thrive in a space where the appearance of awareness is valued over the hard, real action that is needed. In this #manstraming bubble, dialogue is focused on social capital—who knows what, who said what—rather than collaborative problem-solving. The result? The conversation around the openweb becomes cluttered, attention splinters, and meaningful action is overshadowed by a constant churn of noise.
The role of #fahernistas in blocking change, one of the most significant problems with #fahernistas is their ability to dominate platforms and narratives. This domination becomes active blocking when their presence leaves little room for discussions rooted in genuine collaboration and open progress. They inadvertently (or sometimes deliberately) create an environment where the needed ideas and radical challenges to the status quo struggle to gain traction, let along attention. If the openweb is to flourish, this culture of self-referential chatter needs to be mediated.
The #geekproblem is a different kind of barrier, on the other end of the spectrum lies the geekproblem, which refers to the cultural divide within tech communities that leans heavily toward deterministic, technical solutions at the expense of accessible, inclusive approaches. The geekproblem manifests when developers and technologists become gatekeepers, framing issues in ways that reinforce their control by preserve existing narrow structures rather than opening them up for collective problem-solving.
For example, in the #openweb and #fediverse projects, the drive for good #UX runs parallel to an implicit exclusivity of bad UX dressed in “privacy”, “security”, “safety” etc. Technical jargon, complex onboarding processes, and a lack of user-friendly interfaces are a clear barrier to entry and community building. This exclusivity prevents the broader range of participants from engaging meaningfully, turning potentially revolutionary spaces into “specialized” silos, that reinforce this #blindness.
How #fashernistas and #geekproblem interact and often work in unintentional tandem. While the former distracts and fractures attention with endless (pointless, narrow and repeating) discourse, the latter locks down practical pathways for change through gatekeeping and technological insularity. The result is a failing “native” path, where critical mass, and the needed community, fails to form—one part is too busy talking, and the other is too busy coding in isolation. The broader culture of the #openweb suffers as a consequence, making the needed change far more difficult to achieve.
Mediating for change, the solution lies in finding a balance that mediates between the superficiality of fashernistas and the closed nature of the geekproblem. This involves, promoting diverse voices, by ensuring that discussions within the #openweb aren’t monopolized by any tiny group. Building bridges between projects and communities, facilitating communication between technical experts and those involved in discourse to create actionable steps that align with #4opens paths. Developing a culture that values tangible outcomes and collaborative input over performative dialogue and gatekeeping. Amplifying onboarding, by making entry points into #opentech accessible, so people outside traditional tech ghettoes can contribute meaningfully.
The path we need for the openweb, is more than just technological solutions; it needs a culture shift. Both fahernistas and those contributing to the geekproblem need to recognize their roles and adjust their approaches. For the #openweb to thrive, we need spaces that support genuine, inclusive dialogue while fostering collaborative, user-centred technological paths.
The has been to meany years of pratish behaver on this, it’s pastime for #KISS. The current moment presents a fresh opportunity for change. With the fediverse and platforms like mastodon growing exponentially, there is potential to embody the native spirit of the internet as a collaborative, #openspace driven by trust, transparency, and action. Let’s ensure that this potential is not squandered by letting the voices of the few block the progress we need. Ideas please?
https://hamishcampbell.com/the-fahernistas-and-geekproblem-interact-to-work-in-unintentional-tandem/
. The truth is, we completely messed up the last decade of tech development. And yes, we lost a critical battle around 2008. What followed was a lost decade where 
